Left out of the debate
In the debate over birthright citizenship, I’ve not seen anyone dealing with this issue: Where was the proposed citizen conceived? Given the mandated forced births and the whole wonderful …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Attention subscribers
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, below, or purchase a new subscription.
Please log in to continue |
Left out of the debate
In the debate over birthright citizenship, I’ve not seen anyone dealing with this issue: Where was the proposed citizen conceived?
Given the mandated forced births and the whole wonderful world of personhood for amalgamated cellular tissues, why shouldn’t we be dealing with the actual location of the blessed event of conception, whenever and wherever that might be deemed and proven to have occurred?
Dave Porter
Bloomington
