Minnesota deer hunters pay a hidden fifty-cent “wolf tax” on every license and antlerless permit. Minnesota Statutes § 97A.075, subdivision 1(c) is crystal clear: those dollars—roughly …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, below, or purchase a new subscription.
Please log in to continue |
Minnesota deer hunters pay a hidden fifty-cent “wolf tax” on every license and antlerless permit. Minnesota Statutes § 97A.075, subdivision 1(c) is crystal clear: those dollars—roughly $250,000 annually—are appropriated exclusively for “wolf management and damage control.” Those funds are not for climate modeling. Not for wolf-range expansion corridors. Not for internal studies shielded from public view.
Yet for the past three years the Department of Natural Resources has spent the lion’s share of this hunter-funded account on precisely those extraneous priorities while failing to perform the annual mid-winter wolf population surveys required by its own 2022 Wolf Management Plan. The 2024 survey was simply omitted. No research protocols, budgets, or progress reports have been released. Deer hunters—the people who actually write the checks— were not consulted by the Citizen Oversight Committee (before it was dissolved by the Commissioner), the Deer Advisory Committee, or the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association. Most do not even know the fund exists.
DNR’s own published data show wolves killing 35 percent of adult female deer in wolf range. Northern hunters report declining harvests. The statute’s plain language demands that their contributions address predation, monitoring, and livestock conflicts—not speculative corridor projects that would enlarge the very population many license buyers already consider unsustainable.
This is not stewardship; it is statutory noncompliance wrapped in opacity. The DNR must immediately:
Publish itemized annual expenditures, research plans, and results of spending for the Wolf Allocation Fund, both for the past year and the upcoming fiscal year.
Restore mandatory mid-winter population monitoring.
Seat deer-hunter representatives on all allocation decisions (the MDHA doesn’t qualify).
Restrict spending to the statutory purposes of management and damage control.
Deer hunters have fulfilled their statutory obligation by paying the tax. The DNR must now fulfill its obligations. Anything less betrays both the law and the sportsmen who fund it.
Randall Tlachac
Plymouth