Serving Northern St. Louis County, Minnesota

The machine speaks

But Iron Range voters should ask if they’re content with the status quo


As we reported last week, the lack of sufficient net in-migration of new residents, particularly young people, to our region is one of the factors limiting workforce availability here in northeastern Minnesota. It’s a problem shared by many rural regions around the country. A number of studies have shown that Millennials are increasingly gravitating towards urban areas, where they perceive there is a wider range of economic opportunities and more of the types of amenities that they enjoy.

Such trends don’t have to be the death of regions like northeastern Minnesota, but they do suggest that we can’t keep advancing the same economic strategies while expecting different results.

Unfortunately, the political powers-that-be in our region remain deeply wedded to a one-horse strategy focused on mining even as the available evidence suggests that the number of jobs in that industry will continue to decline regardless of the fate of projects like PolyMet.

Robots and driver-less vehicles are quickly replacing actual miners, and that trend will only accelerate with time. The “miners” of the future will be computer programmers and systems operators working in facilities that could be located anywhere in the world. The mines of northeastern Minnesota could soon be operated by tech-savvy personnel living and working in the Twin Cities or even in China, leaving mining employment in our area limited mostly to contract mechanics and suppliers.

Trouble is, the political machine that has long run the Iron Range and has dominated the politics of northeastern Minnesota for decades operates in a near-symbiosis with the mining industry, relying on production taxes and the industry’s large, unionized workforce (and votes) to maintain their power and influence.

It’s been remarkably effective as a political force, but it’s been unable to adapt, or even recognize, the changes in the economy and culture that argue for new approaches. The machine is stuck in the status quo, resistant to new ideas, because the status quo is the basis for their power.

The current DFL legislative contest in District 6B is a case study of the machine in action. Rural Virginia resident Shaun Hainey is the DFL-endorsed candidate with a long history of community involvement, from co-teaching Sunday School, to working on early childhood education, to the Laurentian Chamber of Commerce to the Rotary Club.

Hainey doesn’t strike us as a machine politician. He supports PolyMet, but also sees real value in economic diversification. He’s a bit of a techie and he’d like to see us do more to attract software developers who are also outdoor enthusiasts. These folks make big money on average and can work anywhere there’s a decent Internet connection. There are already a few of them doing their thing up here, but the potential for growth is huge. Hainey is also a huge advocate for education and for more local food production, which he’s doing himself on his small farm in Pike Township where he lives. In addition, he talks about encouraging an entrepreneurial culture in our region, something that always seems to worry the Range machine, which prefers a sense of dependency on mining.

Apparently, others noted that Hainey wasn’t the usual Range politician. Shortly after Hainey won the DFL endorsement, Aurora Mayor Dave Lislegard announced he was entering the race and would run in the DFL primary. Lislegard has made a name for himself as a fierce advocate for all forms of mining and the machine quickly recognized him as one of their own, with endorsements from a slug of staunchly pro-mining local mayors, the steelworkers, and the building trades, each one heralded on the front page of the pro-mining Mesabi Daily News. The message has been clear: The machine has made its selection.

Of course, voters will have their own chance to weigh-in come the August primary. And they’ll need to ask themselves how well the status quo is really working for their families and their communities, or whether a few new ideas might be in order to begin to attract new people and new economic opportunities to our region. Is a relentless push to expand an industry (at the expense of alternatives) with an ever-declining workforce really the best way to invigorate the region’s economic prospects for the long-term? Is the constant refrain of economic woe that emanates from our region’s politicians really the best way to encourage young people to consider our region as a place to live and work?

Worthwhile questions all. We would encourage readers to give some thought to their answers.


8 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
Steve Jacobson

Robots and driver-less vehicles? It may happen someday but it won't happen in mine or Marshall's lifetimes. The extremely large drop off of BWCA users is more likely from the millennials are enjoying it in virtual reality and not coming up here to Ely.

Why has the machine continued to ride the mining wave? It's because the tourism wave is not even a ripple in the water and we have given it enough time to sustain itself and it too is dwindling.

I sincerely believe that mining is our future for many years to come. Most likely the spin off jobs will even increase more that we already anticipate. There is also hope that the Louisiana-Pacific Plant in Cook will add more jobs and take advantage of our abundance of natural resources.

Thursday, June 7, 2018
Marshall Helmberger

Steve... you might want to better inform yourself:

Saturday, June 9, 2018
Steve Jacobson


Between the two of us - one works in mining, knows mining and wants mining to succeed and knows that robotic mining will not happen up here in our lifetimes. The other one......

Tuesday, June 12, 2018
Lee Peterson


In fact, the automation that has reduced the number of workers required to keep the Iron Range mines producing pellets has been incredible and it will continue if these mines are to remain competitive. Just think of the evolution that's happened with the drill rigs and the haul trucks, for example. These mines have not, and will not ignore technological advances.

Maybe there are a few who would like to see the efficient 260 ton capacity haul trucks parked and go back to the high maintenance 35 ton capacity Euclid trucks of the past? That certainly would require more workers! There's one of these old beauties parked at the Mining Museum in Chisholm. I like that old truck. But, go online and look at the autonomous (driverless) Komatsu haul trucks.....

Wednesday, June 13, 2018
Steve Jacobson

Yes, in the late seventies and very early eighties the mines over hired. But once they reduced down to a more reasonable number there has not been any reductions that I know of. At the mine I work in they have actually increased the number of employees since I've been here. And because corporate wants to see only a set number of union and salary employees we have numerous employees employed through employment agencies that are full time but are not "in the system".

Again I will repeat - there are those who want the mines to fail and there are people like me who want them to succeed! I believe I am more happy by keeping a positive and yet real expectation to our future in mining unless the naysayers get their ways!

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

"WANT the mines to fail"? Hmmm. I reread the thread and must have missed that part. I'll read it again.

Wednesday, June 13, 2018
Lee Peterson

I don't get the "want the mines to fail" part either.

But, I do hope that if employment has gone up significantly at that mine, it is because of an increase in production tonnage or the result of producing a more valuable product. If it's a system of accounting that includes ghost employees "not in the system", that could lead to trouble. Sounds kind of fishy to me. Corporate trust? Could be a problem

We did go from mine employment of about 14,000 down to about 4,000 now....

Thursday, June 14, 2018
Shaking my head...

It is interesting to see negativity about mining coming from a retired guy who is living on a pension from the railroad. 90% of is would not be living here if not for mining. A paltry 150 thousand people visit the BWCA a year. I’m guessing 30-40% of the visitors are locals. Ely is a dead zone where tourists grab lunch and gas, the rest of their supplies are purchased in the metro, where the prices are lower. Tourism jobs? Walmart pays more, and the job is for 12 months out of the year. Remember, If it’s not grown, it’s mined!

Tuesday, July 3, 2018