Support the Timberjay by making a donation.

Serving Northern St. Louis County, Minnesota

Deer season ends in disappointment for many

Marshall Helmberger
Posted 11/30/22

REGIONAL— The story for deer hunters in the North Country didn’t improve during the final week of the regular firearms deer season, which ended Sunday, Nov. 20. Deer registrations were …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Deer season ends in disappointment for many


REGIONAL— The story for deer hunters in the North Country didn’t improve during the final week of the regular firearms deer season, which ended Sunday, Nov. 20. Deer registrations were down virtually all across northern Minnesota, and nowhere more dramatically than in St. Louis and Lake counties, where some permit areas saw hunter success fall by as much as 40 percent over last year.
Hunters in permit area 119, located in far northern St. Louis County, registered just 211 deer for the season, which was well under half the 457 deer hunters registered there just four years ago. The falloff in hunter success was even more stunning in permit area 130, which runs from Tower southeast nearly to the North Shore. There, hunters registered just 92 deer on the season. As recently as 2018, hunters had registered 420 deer in that permit area, although that figure was buoyed somewhat by a larger number of antlerless permits issued to hunters that year.
Severe or extended winters in three of the past four years clearly made their mark on the region’s deer herd, although many hunters also pointed to the region’s sizable wolf population as another major factor behind their lack of success. Jessica Holmes, the DNR’s Tower Area Wildlife Manager acknowledged she’s heard more complaints about wolves from hunters this year, although she notes that the two species have evolved together for a long time. “Wolves are an easy target. There are many factors at play here impacting the deer population,” she added. While many factors determine deer numbers, Holmes said wolves can contribute to local declines in combination with other factors.
While the size of the deer harvest can vary from year-to-year in individual permit areas as a result of changes in the number of antlerless permits issued by the DNR, that does not appear to have been a factor in the decline this year, at least in the Tower work area. “There was essentially no change in antlerless permits so we cannot attribute the harvest decline to that,” said Holmes.
While wolf predation is undoubtedly a significant factor, the areas with the lowest harvest numbers track well with the highest winter severity index readings from last winter. Pockets throughout St. Louis, and especially southern Lake and Cook counties, which saw significant lake effect snow last winter, coincide almost perfectly with the permit areas showing the biggest declines in deer registrations.
According to Holmes, tough winter conditions, combined with fragmented winter cover, can increase deer mortality, with or without wolves. And Holmes notes that a portion of the deer that wolves kill would likely not have survived anyway during severe winters. According to Holmes, adequate winter cover not only protects deer from cold winds, but allows them to better escape wolves when they are in the area. Under winter cover, which typically includes dense mature pine, spruce, or balsam fir, snow depths are usually lighter, allowing deer to expend less energy to move around, whether to feed or escape predators.
DNR wildlife officials had expected a disappointing season, as the area deer herd has struggled to recover from high winter mortality in recent years, but none had predicted the kind of dramatic falloff in hunter success experienced this season in northeastern Minnesota.
While hunters struggled to find deer in northern Minnesota, they found more success in the southern half of the state where many permit areas saw an increase in registrations while most others saw only negligible declines over last year. That helped to limit the harvest decline statewide to a more modest nine percent. In total, hunters had registered a total of 152,032 deer statewide as of Nov. 23, with only the muzzleloader and some limited special hunts remaining. That is likely to leave the final statewide harvest well below the DNR’s stated annual goal of 200,000 deer, a target the DNR set in 2018 and hasn’t met since.


2 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • snowshoe2

    there are many factors, like loss of conifer winter cover. Let's look back to the 60s very hard winters and still good deer populations,

    Let's migrate south to the Longville area where wolves have increased this last few decades. Deer populations are at least a 60-year low. Also, the winter index has been low most years.

    Wolves are controlling deer populations, once deer numbers get so low, they can't rebound with abundant wolf populations. Just ask a calf moose. Whoops, the got eaten also.

    Thursday, December 1, 2022 Report this

  • snowshoe2

    Mn DNR studies in Itaska County show when spring deer population is 13 deer or below per sq. mile hunting pressure and wolves will probably cause further declines in deer populations and it will be hard to recover.

    Thursday, December 1, 2022 Report this